Penerapan Garuda Smart City Model  dalam Menganalisa Kesiapan Pemerintah Kabupaten Tulang Bawang Barat Dalam Membangun Konsep Smart City

Bhianta Wijaya; Edi Surya  Negara

doi:10.31154/cogito.v8i2.436.524-536

Authors

Bhianta Wijaya Univeristas Bina Darma
Edi Surya Negara Universitas Bina Darma

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v8i2.436.524-536

Keywords:

Garuda Smart City, Kesiapan, Kabupaten Tulang Bawang Barat.

Abstract

West Tulang Bawang Regency was formed on March 20, 1997 through Law Number 2 of 1997 with an area of 1,201 Km2 or 22% of the area of Lampung province. With such an area, of course, Tulang Bawang Barat district has many complex urban problems, especially for improving services to its people. Until 2019, through the MoU between the local government and the Banyuwangi Regency Government in the development of e-government, it was indicated that the West Tulang Bawang Regency Government had begun to be serious about dealing with regional problems using Information Technology assistance. By realizing the magnitude of the challenges and efforts to accelerate development and shorten the span of control of public services in the Sai Bumi Nengah Nyapur area. In line with these problems, the government of West Tulang Bawang Regency and other stakeholders are committed to accelerating the development of smart cities in West Tulang Bawang Regency. In order to produce a smart city that suits the needs of society and government. On this basis, researchers are trying to examine the readiness of Tulang Bawang Barat Regency in implementing the smart city concept by utilizing the measurement concept of the Garuda Smart City Model (GSCM) where this framework is commonly used in measuring the maturity of a city in implementing smart cities with the target of determining existing conditions, development of recommendations, roadmaps and ratings

References

N. K. R. Indonesia, “Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 49,” 2008.

Heni Marta And D. M. Putti, “Journal Of Planning And Policy Development,” Dimens. Prioritas Sebagai Arahan Pengemb. Smart City Yang Di Utamakan Di Kota Bandar Lampung, Pp. 1–14, 2020.

M. D. K. Perdani, I. Widyastuti, And D. Nupikso, “Analisis Ketersediaan Data Indikator Smart City Kabupaten Tegal,” J. Teknol. Inf. Dan Ilmu Komput., Vol. 8, No. 5, P. 1049, 2021, Doi: 10.25126/Jtiik.2021854573.

D. G. Gella And C. Dwiatmadja, “Analisis Kesiapan Masyarakat Terhadap Implementasi Program Smart City Kota Kupang,” Vol. 7, No. 2, Pp. 327–340, 2022.

I. Ulya A. And A. Tarigan, “Mengukur Kesiapan Kota Dalam Menerapkan Konsep Smart City Inisiatif (Studi Kasus: Kota Banjarmasin),” J. Speed – Sentra Penelit. Eng. Dan Edukasi, Vol. 9, No. 2, Pp. 50–56, 2017.

S. H. Supangkat, “Smart Province,” Smart City Community Innov. Cent., 2018, [Online]. Available: Https://Jatengprov.Go.Id/Wp-Content/Uploads/2018/20180208-Smart-Province-4.Pdf.

Hoiriyah And Y. Efenie, “Analisis Kesiapan Pemerintah Kabupaten Pamekasan Dalam Membangun Kota Cerdas (Smart City) Menggunakan Garuda Smart City Model,” Teknokom, Vol. 2, No. 2, Pp. 17–23, 2019, [Online]. Available: Https://Media.Neliti.Com/Media/Publications/339440-Kajian-Simulasi-Model-Biswas-Sen-Dalam-D-A818d6aa.Pdf.

S. H. Supangkat, A. A. Arman, R. A. Nugraha, And Y. A. Fatimah, “The Implementation Of Garuda Smart City Framework For Smart City Readiness Mapping In Indonesia,” J. Asia-Pacific Stud., Vol. 32, No. 4, Pp. 169–176, 2018, [Online]. Available: Https://Core.Ac.Uk/Download/Pdf/159504667.Pdf.

Y. Kurniasih And T. A. Wismaningtyas, “Smart City Kota Magelang : Perubahan Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah Dalam Penerapan Electronic Governance,” Jiap (Jurnal Ilmu Adm. Publik), Vol. 8, No. 2, P. 356, 2020, Doi: 10.31764/Jiap.V8i2.2734.

A. Hasibuan And Oris Krianto Sulaiman, “Smart City, Konsep Kota Cerdas Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Perkotaan Kabupaten/Kota,” Bul. Utama Tek., Vol. 14, No. 2, Pp. 127–135, 2019, [Online]. Available: Https://Jurnal.Uisu.Ac.Id/Index.Php/But/Article/View/1097.

A. J. Putri And S. Salahudin, “Perencanaan Pengembangan Smart City: Sebuah Kajian Pustaka,” J. Nas. Teknol. Dan Sist. Inf., Vol. 7, No. 2, Pp. 70–78, 2021, Doi: 10.25077/Teknosi.V7i2.2021.70-78.

N. Faidat And M. Khozin, “Analisa Strategi Pengembangan Kota Pintar (Smart City): Studi Kasus Kota Yogyakarta,” Jip (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) Kaji. Ilmu Pemerintah. Dan Polit. Drh., Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 171–180, 2018, Doi: 10.24905/Jip.3.2.2018.171-180.

K. A. P. Nijkamp, “Smart Cities In The Innovation Age,” Innov. Eur. J. Soc. Sci, Vol. 25, No. 2, Pp. 93–5, 2012.

A. Annisah, “Usulan Perencanaan Smart City : Smart Governance Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Mukomuko*,” Masy. Telemat. Dan Inf. J. Penelit. Teknol. Inf. Dan Komun., Vol. 8, No. 1, P. 59, 2018, Doi: 10.17933/Mti.V8i1.103.

Y. Fitri, “Implementasi Kerjasama Pemerintah Kota Semarang Dan Pt. Telkom Dalam Membangun Semarang Smart City,” J. Polit. Gov. Stud., Vol. 6, No. 04, Pp. 91–100, 2017.

Isaca, Enabling Processes Skills And Knowledge Through The Globally Respected Certified Information Systems Auditor ® (Cisa ® ). 2012.

M. D. Irawan, A. Seraya, N. Amalia, And R. R. Arifianda, “Penerapan Cobit 5 Dalam Evaluasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi (Studi Kasus: Dinas Perindustrian Dan Perdagangan Provinsi Sumatera Utara),” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf. Dan Apl., Vol. 3, No. 4, P. 185, 2020, Doi: 10.32493/Jtsi.V3i4.6154.