Can Early Programming Performance Predict Computer Science Students’ Success?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v8i2.452.574-584Keywords:
Computer Programming, Predict Students’ Success, Study Duration, Gender GapAbstract
Investigating the possibility of lower-level computer programming courses predicting future performance of computer science students has received a lot of attention from scholars. This study mainly aimed to predict the success of computer science students based on their performance in the first two computer programming courses, namely Computer Programming I and Computer Programming II. The study employed a quantitative correlational design. Six years of data from graduating students were analyzed. The results demonstrate that the better the grade on Computer Programming I and II, the shorter the study duration. When further analysis was conducted to find out whether gender diversity exists, the results demonstrated that in Computer Programming I and II, female students outperformed males. Statistically, this difference was only significant in Computer Programming I. A greater proportion of female students graduated on time, yet it is not statistically significant.References
J. M. Wing, 2006, Computational thinking, Commun. ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33–35.
ACM and IEEE-CS, 2021, Computing Curricula 2020 paradigms for Global Computing Education, New York.
R. Scherer, F. Siddiq, and B. Sánchez Viveros, 2020, A meta-analysis of teaching and learning computer programming: Effective instructional approaches and conditions, Comput. Human Behav., vol. 109, no. 0318.
S. M. Khan, M. Ibrahim, and S. A. Haider, 2021, Performance Prediction of Computer Science Students in Capstone Software Engineering Course Through Educational Data Mining, ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., no. 479.
D. A. Trytten and A. McGovern, 2017, Moving from managing enrollment to predicting student success, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2017, vol. 2017-Octob, pp. 1–9.
A. N. Kumar, 2018, Predicting student success in computer science - A reproducibility study, Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2019, vol. 2018-Octob, pp. 1–6.
L. J. Sax et al., 2017, Anatomy of an enduring gender gap: the evolution of women’s participation in Computer Science, J. Higher Educ., vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 258–293.
M. Baser, “Attitude, gender and achievement in computer programming,” Middle East J. Sci. Res., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 248–255, 2013.
H. Suwono, R. Fachrunnisa, C. Yuenyong, and L. Hapsari, 2019, Indonesian students’ attitude and interest in STEM: An outlook on the gender stereotypes in the STEM field, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1340, no. 1.
Z. Cai, X. Fan, and J. Du, 2017, Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis, Comput. Educ., vol. 105, no. 2017, pp. 1–13.
S. Beyer, 2014, Why are women underrepresented in Computer Science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades, Comput. Sci. Educ., vol. 24, no. 2–3, pp. 153–192.
Z. Gao, Y. Zhang, R. Zhang, X. Sun, and J. Feng, 2022, Do Gender or Major Influence the Performance in Programming Learning? Teaching Mode Decision Based on Exercise Series Analysis, Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022.
C. Angeli and N. Valanides, 2020, Developing young children’s computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy, Comput. Human Behav., vol. 105.
M. S. Gunbatar and H. Karalar, 2018, Gender differences in middle school students’ attitudes and self-efficacy perseptions towards mBlock programming, Eur. J. Educ. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 925–933.
S. Atmatzidou and S. Demetriadis, 2016, Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences, Rob. Auton. Syst., vol. 75, pp. 661–670.
D. E. Sondakh, S. R. Pungus, and E. Y. Putra, 2022, Indonesian Undergraduate Students’ Perception of Their Computational Thinking Ability, Cogito Smart J., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 68–80.
S. Malla, J. Wang, W. Hendrix, and K. Christensen, 2019, Predicting Success for Computer Science Students in CS2 using Grades in Previous Courses, Proc. - Front. Educ. Conf. FIE, vol. 2019-Octob.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 CogITo Smart Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).