Model Rencana Pembelajaran Semester (RPS) Menggunakan Konsep Kurikulum Mandiri Pada Mobile Learning

Anugerah Bagus  Wijaya; Irfan Santiko; Suliswaningsih Suliswaningsih; Aulia Hamdi; Luky Rafi Anuggilarso; Salsa Billa Zulmi  Zettira

doi:10.31154/cogito.v9i1.446.145-155

Authors

Anugerah Bagus Wijaya Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Irfan Santiko Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Suliswaningsih Suliswaningsih Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Aulia Hamdi Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Luky Rafi Anuggilarso Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
Salsa Billa Zulmi Zettira Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v9i1.446.145-155

Keywords:

Curriculum, Mobile, Learning, Independent, RPS

Abstract

The curriculum is a guide for all students and students in carrying out the learning process in schools and tertiary institutions. The discussion in this article discusses the curriculum at the tertiary level. The sub-discussion that will be studied is about the Rwncana Pembelajaran Semester (RPS). A tertiary institution certainly has guidelines in curriculum development. This curriculum will be reduced to a standard that influences the teaching and learning process. The problem that occurs is that it is often found that learning plans do not always go according to the guidelines they have. This causes the teaching and learning process to be not in line with the goals to be achieved at the end of the lesson. In this article, we will review how to conceptualize a learning plan with the currently popular model, namely mobile learning or abbreviated as m-learning. In m-learning there is a pattern that is considered in accordance with the 5.0 era of society approach, namely running independently. This solution was provided based on the survey method given to a number of respondents who considered that learning would be more effective if there was an independent curriculum that was easily developed and adapted to current learning conditions.

References

I. Santiko, A. B. Wijaya, and A. Hamdi, “Smart Campus Evaluation Monitoring Model Using Rainbow Framework Evaluation and Higher Education Quality Assurance Approach,” J. Inf. Syst. Informatics, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 336–348, 2022, doi: 10.51519/journalisi.v4i2.258.

R. Katharina, Rencana Pembelajaran Semester Dan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Semarang: BP - UNISBANK, 2017.

I. Santiko, T. R. Soeprobowati, and B. Surarso, “Model review on the proposed new smart campus framework in achieving industry 4.0,” in 2021 IEEE 5th International Conference on Information Technology, Information Systems and Electrical Engineering (ICITISEE), 2021, pp. 288–293. doi: 10.1109/ICITISEE53823.2021.9655813.

D. Al-Fraihat, M. Joy, R. Masa’deh, and J. Sinclair, “Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 102, pp. 67–86, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.004.

K. Fahd, S. Venkatraman, S. J. Miah, and K. Ahmed, “Application of machine learning in higher education to assess student academic performance, at-risk, and attrition: A meta-analysis of literature,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 3743–3775, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10741-7.

J. Courtney, “Do monitoring and evaluation tools, designed to measure the improvement in the quality of primary education, constrain or enhance educational development?,” Int. J. Educ. Dev., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 546–559, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.07.002.

T. Oktavia, Meyliana, H. Prabowo, R. Kosala, and S. H. Supangkat, “A conceptual social learning ontology for higher education in e-learning 2.0,” in 2016 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 2016, pp. 165–170. doi: 10.1109/ICIMTech.2016.7930323.

R. Scherer, S. K. Howard, J. Tondeur, and F. Siddiq, “Profiling teachers’ readiness for online teaching and learning in higher education: Who’s ready?,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 118, p. 106675, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106675.

G. Maleko Munguatosha, P. Birevu Muyinda, and J. Thaddeus Lubega, “A social networked learning adoption model for higher education institutions in developing countries,” Horiz., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 307–320, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1108/10748121111179439.

M. Kisworo, “Implementing open source platform for education quality enhancement in primary education: Indonesia experience,” vol. 2016, pp. 295–301, Jul. 2016.

Sudaryono, Metodologi Riset di Bidang TI (Panduan Praktis, Teori dan Contoh Kasus). Yogyakarta: Andi, 2015.

M. Mustika, E. P. A. Sugara, and M. Pratiwi, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Menggunakan Metode Multimedia Development Life Cycle,” J. Online Inform., vol. 2, no. 2, p. 121, 2018, doi: 10.15575/join.v2i2.139.

M. Nurudin, W. Jayanti, R. D. Saputro, M. P. Saputra, and Y. Yulianti, “Pengujian Black Box pada Aplikasi Penjualan Berbasis Web Menggunakan Teknik Boundary Value Analysis,” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 143, 2019, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v4i4.3841.

A. A. Arwaz, T. Kusumawijaya, R. Putra, K. Putra, and A. Saifudin, “Pengujian Black Box pada Aplikasi Sistem Seleksi Pemenang Tender Menggunakan Teknik Equivalence Partitions,” J. Teknol. Sist. Inf. dan Apl., vol. 2, no. 4, p. 130, 2019, doi: 10.32493/jtsi.v2i4.3708.

D. Debiyanti, S. Sutrisna, B. Budrio, A. K. Kamal, and Y. Yulianti, “Pengujian Black Box pada Perangkat Lunak Sistem Penilaian Mahasiswa Menggunakan Teknik Boundary Value Analysis,” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 162, 2020, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v5i2.5446.