Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Taman Kanak-Kanak (TK) dengan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW)

Hamidah Hamidah; Okkita  Rizan; Hengki Hengki

doi:10.31154/cogito.v8i2.430.549-560

Authors

Hamidah Hamidah ISB Atma Luhur
Okkita Rizan ISB Atma Luhur - Pangkalpinang
Hengki Hengki ISB Atma Luhur - Pangkalpinang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v8i2.430.549-560

Keywords:

SPK, Pendidik Berprestasi, SAW, Topsis

Abstract

Based on Law Number 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System, Article 1 point 14 states that early childhood education is a coaching effort aimed at children from birth to the age of six which is carried out through the provision of educational stimuli to help growth and physical and mental development. spiritually so that children have readiness to enter further education. To support this understanding, quality human resources are urgently needed as a priority for national development, the position and role of teachers is increasingly important in preparing the nation's young generation, especially in facing the current global era. The problem that occurs in the selection of outstanding teachers in early childhood education is that the selection is still subjective, causing it to be unfair. For this reason, a decision support system is needed that can overcome these problems by using the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method as a basis for decision making. The method uses 5 criteria, namely education, pedagogy, professionalism, personality and social. The purpose of the support system is to make it easier and faster to determine outstanding teachers so that decisions are objective. Based on the results of the calculations in this study, the results for teacher 1 with a value of 0.85, teacher 2 obtained a value of 0.70, teacher 3 obtained a value of 0.9375, teacher 4 with a value of 0.8625 and teacher 5 with a value of 0.8625 0 ,7625. For this reason, the selection of kindergarten level teachers obtained the best alternative with the highest score being teacher 3 (V3) with a value of 0.9375.

References

K. Pendidikan et al., “Panduan Kerja Pengawas Sekolah Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah,” 2017.

K. Pengantar, “Sertifikasi Guru Tahun 2019,” p. 2019, 2019.

D. I. P. Tahun and T. Penyalahgunaan, “Pada Kelompok Pelajar Dan Mahasiswa,” 2016.

Hamidah, O. Rizan, D. Wahyuningsih, H. A. Pradana, and S. Ramadella, “SAW Method in Supporting the Process of Admission of New Junior High School Students,” 2020 8th Int. Conf. Cyber IT Serv. Manag. CITSM 2020, 2020, doi: 10.1109/CITSM50537.2020.9268874.

H. Hengki, O. Rizan, B. Isnanto, H. Hamidah, and ..., “Optimasi Pemilihan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis SCL Menggunakan Saw Method Pada Perguruan Tinggi XYZ,” Jutis (Jurnal Tek. …, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unis.ac.id/index.php/jutis/article/view/143.

O. Rizan, “Penerapan Metode SAW ( Simple Additive Weighting ) dalam Pemilihan Dosen Favorit Berbasis Web,” pp. 8–9, 2018.

Hamidah and O. Rizan, “Pemilihan Calon Ketua Badan Eksekutif Mahasiswa Dengan Menerapkan FMADM (Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making),” Telematika, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 75–90, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.amikompurwokerto.ac.id/index.php/telematika/article/view/488.

S. H. Kusumadewi, “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM),” Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta, 2006.

I. N. Hanifah, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Dengan Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Tek. Elektro, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 45, 2018.

D. Wahyuningsih and H. Hamidah, “Sistem Informasi Eksekutif STMIK Atma Luhur Dengan Penerapan Customer Relationship Management Berbasis Website,” Sisfotenika, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 96–106, 2017, doi: 10.30700/jst.v7i1.126.

F. Septian and A. Sofyan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Saw (Simple Additive Weighting) (Studi Kasus : Smk Negeri 29 Jakarta Selatan),” J. JI-Tech, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 29–34, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://jitech.i-tech.ac.id/index.php/jitech/article/view/27.

N. Ramadani and N. Heltiani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Dosen Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw),” Comput. Informatics Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 6–9, 2020, doi: 10.33258/cier.1012020.1068.6-9.

A. F. Rachman, S. Rachmatullah, and S. Bahri, “Pemilihan Guru Berprestasi Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dengan Rank Order Centroid,” vol. 4, pp. 111–119, 2021.

S. Kuntilatifah and D. Irawan, “SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN GURU BERPRESTASI di SD Negeri 04 WATUAGUNG MENGGUNAKAN METODE SAW,” Prociding Kmsi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 539–545, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ojs.stmikpringsewu.ac.id/index.php/procidingkmsi/article/view/473/447.

H. Hamidah, “No Title,” sisfokom, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 413–418, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.atmaluhur.ac.id/index.php/sisfokom/article/view/1297/784.

R. Simanaviciene and L. Ustinovichius, “Sensitivity analysis for multiple criteria decision making methods: TOPSIS and SAW,” 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.05.207.

O. Rizan, “Pemanfaatan Framework Web dalam Pengadministrasian Penyaluran Raskin Utilization of the Web Framework in Administering Poor Rice Distribution,” pp. 138–148.

R. E. Setyani and R. Saputra, “Flood-prone Areas Mapping at Semarang City by Using Simple Additive Weighting Method,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.06.089.

A. Rikki, M. Marbun, and J. R. Siregar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Karyawan Dengan Metode SAW Pada PT. Karya Sahata Medan,” J. Informatics Pelita Nusant., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–46, 2016.

T. Y. Chen, “Comparative analysis of SAW and TOPSIS based on interval-valued fuzzy sets: Discussions on score functions and weight constraints,” 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.065.