Implementation of SAW and AHP in Decision-Making Models for Credit Provision in Cooperatives

Rojakul Rojakul; Sumardianto Sumardianto; Gandung Triyono

doi:10.31154/cogito.v10i2.662.418-432

Authors

Rojakul Rojakul Universitas Budi Luhur
Sumardianto Sumardianto Universitas Budi Luhur
Gandung Triyono Universitas Budi Luhur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31154/cogito.v10i2.662.418-432

Keywords:

DSS, SAW, AHP, Cooperative

Abstract

The research aims to overcome the difficulties in selecting the best members of the Al-Amin Independent Corporation, focusing on the challenges faced in determining the best members in the process of giving credit and payments on time. However, many members fail to meet their obligations or fail to pay their contributions smoothly, leading to credit freezes and decreased cooperative income. The cause of a member's failure to pay quotas has not been identified by the current candidate admission selection system. The methods used are Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) applied in the Decision Support System (DSS) model. The results of the research showed the effectiveness of the SAW method in identifying the best and optimal alternative with the highest value on V2 of 4. The AHP method has successfully determined the priority weight and the level of importance for member selection criteria including Activity (0.50), Savings (0.13), Guarantee (0.09), Loan (0.10), Disbursement (0.10), Time Period (0.07). The research provides insight to decision-makers in cooperatives makes important contributions, especially in the granting of credit, and affirms the importance of objective methods in the selection of members.

References

R. L. Andharsaputri and T. Prihatin, “Implementasi Metode AHP dan SAW Guna Keputusan Pemberian Kredit pada Koperasi,” Bianglala Inform., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2022, doi: 10.31294/bi.v10i1.12329.

“Undang-Undang RI No. 25 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perkoperasian Indonesia,” Peratur. Badan Pengawas Keuang., no. 25, pp. 1–57, 1992.

Y. Sonatha, M. Azmi, and I. Rahmayuni, “Group Decision Support System Using AHP, Topsis and Borda Methods for Loan Determination in Cooperatives,” Int. J. Informatics Vis., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 372–379, 2021, doi: 10.30630/JOIV.5.4.640.

D. Prindhi Hapsari, G. Wiro Sasmito, and M. Nishom, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Pada Koperasi Bina Sukses Sejahtera Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting ( Saw ),” no. X.

D. Sedghiyan, A. Ashouri, N. Maftouni, Q. Xiong, E. Rezaee, and S. Sadeghi, “Prioritization of renewable energy resources in five climate zones in Iran using AHP, hybrid AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-SAW methods,” Sustain. Energy Technol. Assessments, vol. 44, p. 101045, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101045.

S. Hendrian and I. Himawan, “Analisis Penerapan Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemberi Kredit Mobil Pada PT. Astra Daihatsu Cabang Kramat Jati,” JRKT (Jurnal Rekayasa Komputasi Ter., vol. 1, no. 02, pp. 129–137, 2021, doi: 10.30998/jrkt.v1i02.6000.

W. Firgiawan, N. Zulkarnaim, and S. Cokrowibowo, “A Comparative Study using SAW, TOPSIS, SAW-AHP, and TOPSIS-AHP for Tuition Fee (UKT),” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 875, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/875/1/012088.

S. Sarwindah, M. Marini, and S. Syarah, “Perbandingan Metode AHP dan Metode SAW Dalam Kelayakan Pemberian Kredit Motor,” J. Media Inform. Budidarma, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 58, 2021, doi: 10.30865/mib.v5i1.2466.

R. Ristiana and Y. Jumaryadi, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Paket Wedding Organizer Menggunakan Metode SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” J. Sisfokom (Sistem Inf. dan Komputer), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 25–30, 2021, doi: 10.32736/sisfokom.v10i1.946.

K. Harefa, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Kelayakan Pemberian Pinjaman dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 136, 2020, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v5i2.3714.

H. M. Mustofa and Syaiful Bakhri, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting Untuk Pengukuran Kinerja Karyawan,” J. Inform. dan Rekayasa Elektron., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 283–290, 2022, doi: 10.36595/jire.v5i2.709.

Fatkhurrochman and D. Astuti, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Topis Dan Saw Dalam Penentuan Penerima Bantuan Pengembangan Rumah Masyarakat Kurang Mampu,” Semnasteknomedia Online, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 2-8–67, 2018.

P. M. Kusumantara, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Ahp Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Platform Media Pembelajaran Daring,” SCAN - J. Teknol. Inf. dan Komun., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.33005/scan.v16i2.2619.

P. M. Kusumantara, M. Kustyani, and T. Ayu, “Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Wedding Organizer Di,” Tek. Eng. Sains J., vol. 3, no. I, pp. 19–24, 2019.

N. H. and M. H., “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Prioritas Pengembangan Industri Kecil dan menengah Di Lampung Tengan Menggunakan Analitical Hierarchy Process (AHP),” Semnasteknomedia Online, no. April, pp. 6–7, 2016.

D. J. Lesmana and S. Hansun, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mobil dengan AHP-SAW,” J. Teknol. Inf. Indones., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 24–31, 2020, doi: 10.30869/jtii.v5i1.522.

S. M. Latifah and D. A. Diartono, “Analisis Perbandingan Metode Fuzzy Logic Dan Metode SAW Dalam Pemilihan Keluarga Penerima Bantuan Sosial,” J. Inform. J. Pengemb. IT, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 193–198, 2023, doi: 10.30591/jpit.v8i3.5374.

H. N. Anisa, E. Santoso, and L. Muflikhah, “Penerapan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) dan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) pada Pembiayaan Anggota (Studi Kasus: Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Pembiayaan Syariah Tunas Artha Mandiri (KSPPS TAM) di Kab. Nganjuk),” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 2533–2541, 2022.

A. S. Tammayyusdin, G. Sandra, W. W. Laureta, and D. N. Sulistyowat, “Sistem penunjang keputusan pemasaran pada koperasi simpan pinjam keluarga sejahtera dengan metode AHP,” OJS Semin., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 120–128, 2021.

P. Sutoyo and Dewi Nusraningrum, “Comparative Study Decision Support System AHP and SAW Method in Tender Process TV Transmission Stations,” Dinasti Int. J. Digit. Bus. Manag., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 842–856, 2020, doi: 10.31933/dijdbm.v1i5.487.